In early 1993, Bob Larson Ministries suffered financial turbulence
as a result of the negative publicity generated by articles in World
and Cornerstone magazines. But in 1994, BLM has gone into a 'Tilton
tailspin'. Revenues have fallen steadily since September, and there
is no end in sight. Like Tilton (and, convicted felon Troy Snowdon)
before him, Larson has been doing all he can to project an image that
everything is under control. However, reports from inside the walls
of his third-floor fortress strongly suggest otherwise.
In recent months, Larson has been forced to cut back on everything
-- except, in all likelihood, his bloated compensation package. Five
BLM employees left at or around the end of the year, but only one has
been replaced, and a hiring freeze is said to be in effect. While
staffers have been run ragged to make up for those losses, plans were
announced in January to cut as much as an additional 25% of the Min
istry's staff.
With the Grim Reaper peering over one shoulder -- and Larson, look
ing over the other -- staff morale reportedly is nonexistent. Para
noia has become the order of the day, as Bob frantically searches for
the leaks in his badly-listing ship. The information flow has become
so constricted that employees are having difficulty doing their jobs.
The Ministry has lost its' sense of mission ... and a sense of direc
tion.
Reports are that the staff has been stretched so thin that, for his
recent trip to the National Religious Broadcasters' (NRB) convention
in Washington D.C., Larson coaxed former sidekick Bonnie Bell out of
retirement. Not that Bob had to twist her arm very hard; she has had
only one radio gig since leaving the Ministry -- and was fired after
four days.1
Last week was a good one for Bob Larson employees -- their fearless
leader was out of the office for most of it. But when he got back on
Wednesday, he almost managed to make up for his absence. Our sources
tell us that, after what appeared to have been a less-than-successful
NRB convention, Bob came back to the office loaded for bear.
The Larson scandal has long been common knowledge within the Chris
tian broadcasting fraternity, but determining how it has affected his
standing has been somewhat problematic. However, Bob's acidic intro
duction of Satanic artist and journalist Tim Butler gives us an indi
cation that all definitely is not well:
Bob Larson -- that consummate press hound -- has suddenly performed
a Michael Jackson. He's canceled his Dangerous ... uh, I mean, "Save
Our Kids from Satanism" tour, a consistent money-maker for years. He
will answer the call of the Church of Satan's house-organ, the Black
Flame, but whenever a Christian reporter comes knocking, he evidently
tells him to "just beat it!" And while Bob did his level best to make
that remark in jest, his voice betrayed resignation. He has, by and
large, lost the battle to cabinin the news of his misdeeds -- and it
sounds as if the NRB convention hammered that point home.
Bob has finally made the "A" list: those preachers who have distin
guished themselves by their avaricious antics. For instance, in Per
sonal Freedom Outreach's Quarterly Journal, cult-busters Kurt Goedel
man and Richard Fisher put Bob in an interesting kettle of fish:
As it was with Jim Bakker, it seems as if everyone is getting into
the act. The erstwhile Robert Tilton Fan Club Newsletter (now Snake
Oil: Your Guide to Kooky Kontemporary Kristian Kulture), came out
with a delicious interview with Satanist Boyd Rice, entitled "My Din
ner with Bob Larson." Therein, Rice relates one of Larson's numerous
brushes with death:
I wasn't invited to the party, but my sources were at least able to
confirm that Larson did invite himself over for dinner, and Bob Guc
cione, Jr. was staying at his house at the time.
Snake Oil's "Brother Randall" has a world-class sense of humor, and
he does his homework. For example, he ran a picture of the cover of
one of Larson's albums, "Peace Within My Soul." Seeing a younger Bob
-- with hair! -- is a real shock; he looks a lot like Opie with side
burns. Nature abhors a vacuum, and Bob Tilton is off the air....
The Larson files ought to keep pundits in one-liners for the better
part of 1994. Still, there is a poignant slant to this sordid story.
From all I have been able to gather, Bob Larson is a tortured soul --
a man whose achievements are overshadowed by a pervasive inadequacy.
And nowhere is that more evident than in this love letter, which Lori
Boespflug claims Bob gave to her in early 1991:
"A PERSONAL, ORIGINAL MESSAGE FROM SOMEONE WHO, IN SPITE OF HIS
EXTENSIVE PERSONAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS, AT TIMES FEELS AS THOUGH HE
CAN'T QUITE MEASURE UP THE ACHIEVEMENTS HE WANTS MOST IN LIFE,
AND AT TIMES FEELS THE ONE PERSON WHO MATTERS MOST SEEMS MORE
PRONE TO ACCENTUATE THE NEGATIVE THEN NURTURE THE POSITIVE:
REFLECTIONS ON A TEMPESTUOUS RELATIONSHIP
The deepest roots grow against resistance,
The strongest bonds are forged from conflict,
The greatest friendships are produced by honesty,
The most secure feelings stem from forthrightness,
And the deepest love abides in hearts tested by adversity.
WHEN IT'S ALL SAID AND DONE, THIS IS HOW I REALLY FEEL.
THANK YOU FOR BEING THE BEST FRIEND I'VE EVER HAD!
THE ABOVE POEM COMPOSED IN GRATITUDE TO MY BEST FRIEND, 2/27/91"6
The poem was unsigned, but the evidence that Larson was infatuated
with Boespflug -- a rather attractive lady, by the way -- is substan
tial. He showered her with gifts, obtained the loan on her Grand Am,
and other staffers reported7 that he had been courting her. Assuming
that it is authentic, it offers us a furtive look into Larson's 'dark
night of the soul'. It is only one piece in a composite of a man who
is obsessed with his failures ... and constantly needs to be reminded
that he IS somebody.
It is said that whom gods would destroy, they first make mad....
The 'New Math'....
Long-time Larson listeners have told me that, if things aren't bad,
they invariably are worse. As such, it is easy to tune out the cries
of impending doom. But this time, he may be telling the truth.
Larson often reveals more in what he doesn't say as in what he does
-- his claim that he has had to cancel sixteen stations has a glimmer
of truth to it. Still, what Bob calls a cancellation letter is typi
cally a ploy for renegotiating his contracts. It is little more than
a polite threat: If you don't reduce your price, we'll take our busi
ness elsewhere. For the most part, the stations make concessions, or
in some instances, accept capped revenue-sharing arrangements. It is
rare for Bob to abandon a market, and then, he does so only as a last
resort. But station managers don't know that ... and neither do most
of his listeners.
The situation in Salt Lake City is an excellent example. It
serves as a sort of loss leader: Even though Utahns don't support it,
Larson more than makes it up in other markets, where people see it as a
missionary outreach. He has played that perception to the hilt,
periodically mounting campaigns to "Save Salt Lake." He wants to keep
that market, but it appears that the local U.S. Bankruptcy Court has a
few ideas of their own.
An informant advises me that the Court is trying to arrange a sale
of the station to another religious broadcaster. When the sale goes
through, all of the existing contracts will be null and void, and Bob
will almost certainly lose that affiliate. And while it is difficult
to predict the future, odds are that the loss will be attributed to a
lack of listener support.
Under normal circumstances, the threat of losing an affiliate could
be taken lightly. However, as donations plummet, and he is forced to
dip into reserves, Larson is in less of a position to haggle. And on
the other side of the table, the station managers read World and Cor
nerstone, too -- they are less liable to bet on Talk-Back's comeback.
As such, more stations will be inclined to reject Larson's overtures.
In terms of profit margin -- aside from Dallas-Ft. Worth, which is
a special case -- Bob Larson Ministries' most profitable markets are
'second-tier' cities like Columbus, Denver, and Seattle. The cost of
air time is far more reasonable than that in a New York, Los Angeles,
or Chicago, and the out-of-pocket cost per listener reached is lower.
Smaller cities (e.g., Anchorage, Wichita, and Salinas) are almost as
lucrative, but they don't offer the same profit potential.
Problem is, Larson's premier markets are large enough to support a
commercial Christian music station. His Denver affiliate, KLTT, went
to an all-music format in November; Detroit's WLQV is rumored to fol
low suit in March.8 Bob pays well -- and on time -- and at one time,
that made Talk-Back a fairly hot commodity. Today, given Bob's other
well-known liabilities, his 'star' has lost much of its' luster. And
as Christian radio station owners adjust to the realities of the mar
ketplace, he sees the handwriting on the wall.
This was the impetus behind Bob's call to 'revive Christian radio':
Successful and well-respected ministries like Focus on the Family and
the Christian Research Institute will survive this industry shakeout,
but Larson's antics have earned him a place on the endangered species
list. With a rapidly-declining donor base, he can't compete with his
brethren, and with Ministry morale being nothing short of disastrous,
just keeping the BLM ship afloat is a formidable task.
Bob will leave the air when Bob is good and ready, and not a moment
sooner. Even by conservative estimates, Bob still has a $2.5 million
war chest. Even if most of his donations dried up tomorrow, he could
last the year without serious difficulty; eliminating less-profitable
stations and renegotiating existing contracts stretches his reserves
even further. He could even (God forbid!) take a pay cut -- cashing
in his split-dollar life insurance policy would enable him to pay his
airtime bill in Denver for more than a year. Money is not an object.
If he leaves the mike, it will likely be as a result of the accumu
lated pressure. Potentially, Bob has as much to fear from the IRS as the
Christian press, and if anyone on his senior staff goes to either one,
it would be the beginning of the end. Senior Vice-President Angelo
Diasparra may be the biggest risk -- he's a tough (and from what I'm
told, when he's not playing the heavy, rather likeable) old bird, and
Bob won't be able to intimidate him. And like Garyl Gibson did with
respect to Troy Snowdon, he might decide that it is better to get out
while the getting is good. Even Laura, his youg bride, is a possible
security risk.
A variety of Larson confidants have reported that Bob has a vicious
temper, and is prone to be verbally abusive. Lori Boespflug told me
that he could get so out of control that she was "afraid to leave him
alone" with any of her three girls. Furthermore, my BLM sources have
also reported that the initial year of Bob and Laura's marriage was a
particularly rocky one. Laura's parents are divorced, and let us not
forget that both of them are working on their second spouse. And Bob
can't help but bring his stresses home with him. If there was ever a
prescription for marital trouble, that is about as close as it gets.
Simply coming to work in the morning must be a formidable challenge
for Bob. From the boardroom to the mail room, he reportedly suspects
everyone of being a possible mole. Every caller is a potential land
mine. The next P.R. blow could come from anywhere from 60 Minutes to
Christianity Today, and when he expects his opponents to strike, they
just sit back and laugh. For a 'control freak' like him, that has to
be intolerable.
But let us not cry for Bob. When it comes to getting money out of
"his" Ministry, Larson rivals L. Ron Hubbard for sheer ingenuity, and
you can rest assured that he'll do everything in his power to ensure
that his escape from public life is a profitable one. For instance,
while the Ministry has cut back on frills like Compassion Connection
and the Hope Line, it continues to lavish compensation on Bob. BLM's
alleged financial difficulties didn't stop it from buying a $200,000
split-dollar life insurance policy for his benefit:
As part of the president's employment agreement, the Ministry
purchased a split dollar life insurance policy for the presi
dent's benefit. The Ministry pays the annual premium, of which
$1,470 constitutes compensation to the president in accordance
with Internal Revenue Service regulations. In the event of
termination of the plan, the Ministry would receive the lesser
of the policy cash surrender value, or the accumulated non-
compensation premium payments (split) and the president would
receive the excess of accumulated retirement benefits over the
policy cash surrender value, if any. In the event of premature
death of the president, the Ministry would receive an amount
equal to the accumulated premium payments and the president's
named beneficiary would receive the balance of the death bene
fit proceeds. For the year ended December 31, 1992, the Minis
try paid $52,719 in total premiums. As of December 31, 1992,
included in other assets on the balance sheet is the cash sur
render value of the policy which is $27,564.9
The key to understanding a split-dollar life insurance policy is in
who benefits. The Ministry puts up the cash -- and takes the risk --
but gets only a guaranteed rate of return. However, if the insurance
company's investments are profitable, and the value of said policy at
termination exceeds its' cash surrender value (as it generally does),
the surplus goes to the executive.
Let's put this into perspective. The Ministry used over $52,000 of
sacrificially-given funds in 1992 to give Bob Larson a $200,000 split
dollar life insurance policy. BLM could have bought $200,000 in term
life insurance for less than $1,500, and used the remainder to 'save'
stations. But, what the heck, it is Bob Larson's ministry....
And The 'New Bob'....
Before Tuesday, Bob Larson seemed as if he was on a fairly unevent
ful ride toward oblivion. He skillfully steered his shows away from
anything that might permit a discussion of his financial and personal
woes, hoping perhaps to 'ride out the storm'. And this was not unex
pected: Bob can be quite a cool customer when he wants to be, and not
drawing attention to himself was certainly a viable strategy. Things
were quiet ... almost too quiet.
And then, it happened.
The surreal (and, from a tactical perspective, long-overdue) sequel
to his classic "Bob on the Block," Tuesday's show "Bob Bares All" was
another remarkable tour de force from The Mighty Larson Art Players.
No one seriously expected that Bob would give straight answers to his
listeners' legitimate questions, but then again, no one expected that
he would become completely unglued. He didn't just jump off the deep
end ... he tried a triple somersault with a half-twist. Whenever Bob
does anything, he does it in style.
It didn't take long for the Internet articles to come up in conver
sation. The second caller, a fellow from Vancouver, popped the ques
tion -- and Bob sidestepped it like a Bill Clinton wannabe:
CHRIS: "I just wanted to talk with you about this, there's a
large file of information on -- about you, or..."
.
BL: "A large file? Oh, there's all kinds of files of
information on me. Goodness knows, you can get it on
computer bulletin boards, you can write people -- write
people who publish their addresses and they will send you
more information about me than I know about myself. It's
all there -- it's there for the taking, it's there for
the asking, and no, you can't give the address over
the air. I do have some scruples."
CHRIS: "I don't want to. I just wanted to ask you a question
about it, actually."
BL: "I don't know ... what do you want to ask me about it?"
CHRIS: Well, it's pretty -- pretty damaging. I'm just wondering
about this Evangelical Council for Financial Responsibility
[sic]. Is it true you guys withdrew from that?"
BL: "Yeah. I suggest that you write them and you ask them who
serves on their standards committee, how they are chosen, what
they are paid, and ask for a biographical profile of the people
who judge the other people and see how fast you get that
information. And from vividly vivacious Vancouver, goodbye."10
The NRB's Pat Mahoney told me in a telephone interview that it was
her understanding that the allegedly private information Bob was com
plaining about would be given out to anyone who asked.11 After all,
NRB potentates' salaries are matters of public record, and a man with
legitimate credentials has no reason to hide them.12
NRB president E. Brandt Gustavson declined to comment with respect
to the Larson scandal -- but an unofficial source inside the NRB sug
gested that there is a reason for his silence. It was reported that,
when Larson withdrew BLM's ECFA application, he warned Gustavson that
if he ever breathed anything to the press about why BLM withdrew its'
application, he would sue. Assuming the veracity of that report, and
given Larson's well-earned reputation for using lawsuits as offensive
weapons, such a threat could not have been taken lightly.
No one was safe from Bob's wrath on Tuesday -- even self-confessed
Bob-backers were waylaid by his staccato blasts. Consider this call,
from Jim in Anchorage:
JIM: "I've always wanted to know, I know that people talk to
you about money and what-not--"
BL: "Yeah, why do they always want to do that, Jim? Why do
they always pick on me? Why doesn't -- I want to know --
why doesn't anybody ever call up Charles Standley or
Chuck Colson or Jim Dobson and say to them, 'Please
could you publish your financial IRS return and let us
know all of your sources of income, how you got it,
and where it came from? Why doesn't anybody ever ask
them?'"13
I wasn't the first person to report on Bob Larson's financial con
dition, but I should be qualified to respond. To be blunt, Larson is
a relative nobody -- almost a cult figure. No one in the Evangelical
community would permit me to write this story, and few in the secular
world have even a vague notion as to who he is. That's why I offered
the story to Jay Grelen in the first place, and satisfied myself with
working the fruits of the investigation into two of my books. If, as
Larson has publicly insinuated, I was out to destroy Christianity, or
at least, a prominent Christian leader, I would have gone after some
one significant, like Jim Dobson.
It is not -- nor, will it ever be -- my role to be the watchdog for
the Evangelical community. As such, I haven't really made it a prac
tice to rummage through every evangelist's bank account. Based on my
dealings with them, I am fairly satisfied that Focus on the Family is
a class act. And, on the other side of the fence, it's tough to pick
on Howard Stern -- he is perfectly honest about what he is doing, and
he hasn't parked his snout at the federal trough. But, since Bob has
thrown down his gauntlet, I decided to make a quick inquiry into Wat
ergate alum Chuck Colson's Prison Fellowship ministry.
Prison Fellowship is run the way you would expect a ministry to be
run -- they almost seem to invite scrutiny. Colson doesn't have any
outside sources of income: all his honoraria and royalties are given
to his ministry. Indeed, he was recently awarded the Templeton Prize
($1,000,000) and he had the check made out to Prison Fellowship.14
And, just in case anyone is sufficiently curious to inquire further,
Prison Fellowship's taxpayer ID is 62-0988294, their mailing address
is P.O. Box 17500, Washington DC, 20041, and the applicable IRS form
is 4506-A.
Or That Same Old Song and Dance?
In the Bob Larson Theater of the Absurd, the outer limits of credu
lity are tested daily. Like Mike Warnke, Larson is a master at using
gross exaggeration to drive home his points. It's not intellectually
honest, but as former Christian talk-show host John Stewart put it to
me, talk radio isn't exactly brain surgery. Ergo, it works.
On the February 8 show, in a desperate ploy to win back the 'hearts
and' minds of the legions of listeners persuaded by his critics, Lar
son tried his hand at not-too-subtle satire:
"It's absolutely amazing to me that people -- the things that
people think about me -- I mean, I don't believe it. A while
back, we got a phone call, and somebody said, 'You know, I'd
like to know about Bob's Arabian horse farm . I mean, is it really true that Bob has
an Arabian horse farm?' No, it's not really true.
And then, we get these people who say, 'I know what Bob's
doing with his money -- he's driving a Mercedes.' Absolutely.
Or maybe, a Lanborghini .
I mean, it's-- you would not believe some of the things that
people come up with. So, I mean-- I mean, what are they going
to accuse me of next? Are they going to accuse me of having my
own private baseball franchise? ...
Oh, and then, there was the one about my LearJet . I mean, I don't know where people get
this stuff."15
And during the second hour, Bob continued to hammer on that theme:
"I'll tell you what gets to me: This is the stupid garbage --
yes, it's stupid garbage -- stupid garbage people believe. I
get this stuff printed about me, written about me, said about
me ... and I read this stuff. I mean, I wasn't joking about
the Arabian horse farm. We actually got a phone call, and
somebody said I, uh, ... that was before they said I owned five
houses-- . I wish I did own an Arabian horse farm.
I'd love to own an Arabian horse farm. I don't own an Arabian
horse farm -- or five houses."16
As with other common examples of 'Larson logic', it doesn't bear up
well under close examination. Distilled to essentials, Bob is argu
ing that, because uninformed individuals are allegedly spreading out
landish rumors, the carefully-tempered and well-documented reports in
the Christian press should likewise be disregarded. To the best of my
knowledge, no one in the media has accused Bob of owning a LearJet, a
stable of Arabian horses, a top-of-the-line Mercedes, or broadcasting
from the side of his indoor swimming pool. However, there is one of
these arguably absurd allegations which may have some basis in fact:
the claim that Bob owns five houses.
I haven't reported on this aspect of the Larson story on grounds of
relevance, but since Bob has made such a federal case of it, the sub
ject has become germane.
Jay Grelen and Doug LeBlanc started this ball rolling in the first
World article, "This Is Me, This Is Real," by writing that "Larson's
papers in the divorce case also report that: ... When they divorced,
the Larsons owned five pieces of real estate, including two in the
Rocky Mountains, worth $539,200."17 And since Bob signed the papers
in question under penalty of perjury, their report was presumptively
accurate.
Grelen and LeBlanc didn't present Larson's financial information as
adroitly as they could have; it's easy to see how five pieces of real
estate can be translated into five houses. Still, one of the parcels
was a vacant lot -- albeit, a valuable one -- scheduled to be sold as
a result of the divorce. A second one was nothing more than a cabin,
and a third was ex-wife Kathy's townhouse. The family home was sold.
The only significant piece of real estate he got from the divorce was
the ski condo. With everything that Grelen and LeBlanc had an oppor
tunity to have reported on, the division of the marital estate was a
questionable choice.
Yet, once his divorce was final, and the success of Dead Air buoyed
his confidence, Bob got back into the Colorado real estate market in
a big way. And to the best of our knowledge, he now owns the follow
ing properties:
Bob Larson's Parade of Homes18
Property Purchase Date
Description Price Evidenced by Ck'd
28XXX Meadowlark Dr., $440,000 Deed (reception # 2/93
Golden, CO 91112013)
13XXXW. Ohio Ave., $79,900 Deed (reception # 2/93
Lakewood, CO 92089695)
Hearthstone Mountainhomes $199,000 Deed (reception # 2/93
at Aspenridge Condos, illegible on
Unit 2, Building 1, copy; bought
Summit County, CO 9 Dec. 1987)
Winterland condo(s?) $32,50019 Bob's affidavit N/A
We also have an unconfirmed report that Bob owns a townhouse in the
greater Phoenix area. If that report is true, and he hasn't sold any
of the aforementioned properties, then he owns five houses. Granted, it
might look bad, but there is no evidence to suggest that he leaves his
second, third and even fourth homes vacant when he is not around. For
instance, there are all sorts of reasons for him to own the house his
parents live in, and resort-area condos are easily rented. Thus, in the
grand scheme of things, it doesn't matter one whit whether Bob owns
three, four or even more houses; what ought to matter is whether he
improperly used sacrificially-given funds to pay for them.
[What I find more remarkable is that a man who insists that he con-
stantly receives serious death threats, and is forced to travel under
assumed names, should take so precious little care to protect himself
from the rogues' gallery of assorted crazies who purportedly threaten
him. All Bob would have had to have done is set up some out-of-state
partnership to buy the property, hold his partnership interest in an
innocuously-named trust, and tell those few staffers who need to know
his whereabouts that he is only renting his house. The casual yahoo
from Columbus shouldn't have any hope of finding him, and all but the
most persistent and well-financed reporter would have difficulty fol
lowing the trail. But Bob has done everything short of taking out an
ad in the Black Flame -- anyone who wanted to find him could do so in
five minutes, tops. Either he doesn't take the alleged death threats
seriously, or he is incredibly stupid.]
It is written that 'the wages of sin are death' -- and it is beginning
to look as if Bob Larson Ministries is gradually slipping into a
coma. A good show -- one that would have drawn $12-15,000 in pledges
only three years ago -- reportedly pulls in around $3-5,000. And, like
the proverbial three-year-old that blames the family cat for knocking
over the cookie jar, Bob is looking desperately for a scapegoat. Bob
is rather creative in that respect -- he may be the only radio minis
ter in history to blame a drop in Canadian donations on the election
of a U.S. president -- but the fact remains that if the cookie jar is
broken, all the excuses in the world won't fix it.
Was Bob's bizarre outburst of February 8 merely another in a seem
ingly endless repertoire of mindless theatrics, or was it a harbinger
of troubles to come? I don't suppose that we'll ever know. But what
Bob said to his listeners, his critics will openly second: He doesn't
need luck; he needs prayer -- and repentance.
ENDNOTES
1Ministry sources informed us of Bonnie's unfortunate situation; Fred
Wheeler confirmed with the radio station in question that she was no
longer employed there.
2 Bob Larson, "Talk-Back With Bob Larson," Radio broadcast, 2 Feb.
1994 (tape on file).
3M. Kurt Goedelman and G. Richard Fisher, "Charged with Character
Assassination: PFO Responds to Heresy Hunters by James R. Spencer,"
Personal Freedom Outreach Quarterly Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, Jan.-
Mar. 1994, p. 5. (The Quarterly Journal can be downloaded from the
JPUSA bbs [(312) 878-6030], or you can obtain a copy by writing PFO,
P.O. Box 26062, St. Louis, MO 63136.)
4Ibid., p. 12.
5"My Dinner with Bob Larson" [interview with Boyd Rice], Snake Oil,
Issue #2 (no date), p. 5. ("Brother Randall" has been actively doing
research on Larson, and, as is my standard practice, I'm loading him
for bear.
It's tough to pin these guys down theologically, but they appear to
limit their criticisms to the Word-Faith crowd: Jim Bakker, Dr. Gene
Scott, Paul Crouch, and David Koresh are representative 'targets' of
their inoffensive barbs. You can obtain a copy by writing Snake Oil,
6102 E. Mockingbird #374, Dallas, TX 75214. The cover price is $2,
and the good Brother insists upon cash. For those interested in the
other Bob, he has compiled a piece titled "The Beast of Robert Til
ton" [check for $6.66 payable to D. Rose; same address].)
6Unsigned, "Reflections on a Tempestuous Relationship," 27 Feb. 1991,
p. 1.
7E.g., Anonymous, Letter (to Edward Atsinger, President of Salem Com
munications), 1991. (The authenticity of the letter was confirmed by
former Salem employee, attorney, and Christian talk-show host John
Stewart.)
8Courtesy of our Detroit correspondent, who doubtless will be going
off-line with LQV; his presence will be missed.
9Bob Larson Ministries, 1992 Consolidated Financial Statements
(obtained from Bob Larson Ministries, 25 August 1992, balance sheet
reprinted in summary form in K. Smith, "The Cowering Inferno," also
on file with Internet), p. 10.
10Bob Larson, "Talk-Back With Bob Larson," Radio broadcast, 8 Feb.
1994 (tape on file).
11Patricia Mahoney, Telephone interview, 9 Feb. 1994.
12Cf., Mt. 5:14-16.
13Bob Larson, "Talk-Back With Bob Larson," Radio broadcast, 8 Feb.
1993 (tape on file).
14Lee Vaughn (Prison Fellowship Development Dept.), Telephone inter
view, 9 Feb. 1994. (As I recall, I'd first heard the part about the
Templeton Prize on an interview he did on William F. Buckley's Fir
ing Line.)
15Bob Larson, "Talk-Back With Bob Larson," Radio broadcast, 8 Feb.
1993 (tape on file).
16Ibid., ibid.
17Jay Grelen and Doug LeBlanc, "This Is Me, This Is Real," World,
Vol. 7, No. 32, 23 Jan. 1993, pp. 7-8.
18Copies of deeds on file. Since the property description for the first
two parcels double as street and mailing addresses, I have deleted the
last three digits in the description. This strikes what I submit is a
reasonable balance in shielding the Larsons from unwanted communication
but providing enough information so those who wanted to check my work
may do so.
19"Affidavit with Respect to the Financial Affairs of Bobby E. Lar
son," Larson v. Larson, No. 91 DR 226 (Jefferson County (Colo.) Dist.
Ct., filed 18 July 1991, at 7. (The divorce file itself was sealed by
order of the Court on 13 Feb. 1992.)
Copyright 1994 Kenneth L. Smith. All rights reserved. Copying is
permitted for non-commercial use only. Please direct your questions
to the author at P.O. Box 280305, Lakewood, CO 80228.
Posted to the Net by Scott Mikusko, 21922sm@msu.edu.
RETURN